ive
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(41) AKASH PANDEY Vs. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 307, 302 and 34 - Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 –The bail application in connection with the stabbing, is the central issue - The petitioner argues for bail, citing completion of investigation, no criminal antecedents, and no specific role in the stabbing as per prosecution's story - The State contends the seriousness of the offence and the risk of the accused influencing witnesses if granted bail - The Court denies bail, noting the accused's prese
India Law Library Docid # 2414689

(42) AMIT ARORA Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Stable Condition - Court rejects hospital shift, orders AIIMS Checkup for Accused - The petitioner is suffering from multiple serious medical conditions and has been hospitalized for over 200 days - Despite this, his health has deteriorated, leading to frequent vomiting and other complications - The main issue is whether Petitioner’s medical condition warrants continued hospitalization or if he can be managed in judicial custody at Tihar Jail - The petitioner argues that his health has worsened
India Law Library Docid # 2414690

(43) KAMLESH DEVI Vs. STATE OF DELHI NCT AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 363, 365, 372, 376(2)(n), 344, 346 and 34 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 6 and17 – Kidnapping and sexually assault – The case revolves around a minor who was allegedly abducted and sexually assaulted - The bail application of the mother of the co-accused, 'K'-Petitioner, is a key issue - The petitioner claims no specific role in the crime and is a housewife dependent on her family - The State opposes bail, citing serious alleg
India Law Library Docid # 2414691

(44) AMMAR ABDUL RAHIMAN Vs. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 120B of IPC r/w S. 2(o) r/w S.13 and Sections 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – Appellant appealed against the dismissal of his bail application - He was accused of being radicalized towards ISIS and engaging in activities supporting the establishment of a Caliphate in India - The main issue was whether the material found on Appellant's digital devices was sufficient to establish his association with ISIS and whether it warranted the
India Law Library Docid # 2414692

(45) SONALKUMAR SURESHRAO SALUNKHE AND OTHERS Vs. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Patents Act, 1917 - Sections 21(1) and 117A – Appeals to Appellate Board - The petition challenges an order from the Assistant Controller of Patents, which deemed a patent application abandoned due to non-compliance with the First Examination Report (FER) - The main issue is whether the petition is maintainable under Section 117A of the Patents Act, as the impugned order was passed under Section 21(1), which does not allow for an appeal - The petitioner argues that they responded to the FER and
India Law Library Docid # 2414669

(46) ANR GROUP OF COMPANY Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Section 36 - Alienation of immovable property of public trust - The petitioner is upset by the Joint Charity Commissioner's directive to issue public notices inviting fresh offers for the sale of property owned by Respondent No.2-Trust - The main issue is whether the Commissioner was justified in directing these offers, despite the petitioner being the highest bidder in the initial auction process - The petitioner argues that the auction process was already compl
India Law Library Docid # 2414670

(47) DHARMENDRA MEENA S/O SHRI DWARKA PRASAD MEENA Vs. SMT. RUKMANI BAI AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Property Dispute - The appeal involves a dispute over a share in property belonging to the late ‘B’ - The appellant claims rights through an unregistered Will, while the respondent, ‘R’ is the real daughter seeking her share - The primary issue is the validity of the unregistered Will dated 25.4.2008, which favors the appellant, who is not the natural heir - The appellant contends that the Will is valid and that the burden of proving it as fabricated lies with the respondent - The respondent, b
India Law Library Docid # 2414673

(48) NARENDRA LODHI Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 06-05-2024
Possession of 315 bulk liters of illicit liquor - The applicant was arrested for possession of 315 bulk liters of illicit liquor and has been in judicial custody since March 19, 2024 - The main issue is whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The petitioner claims false implication, no criminal antecedents, and no likelihood of absconding or tampering with evidence - The State opposes the bail application, suggesting that granting
India Law Library Docid # 2414674

(49) CHARAN SINGH YADAV Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 06-05-2024
M.P. Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Section 89 - Petitioner, challenged an order demanding a recovery amount of Rs.4,73,734/- issued by the CEO, Jila Panchayat, Vidisha - The main issue was the maintainability of the revision against the show-cause notice and the lack of adjudication before issuing the demand notice - The petitioner argued that no adjudication was done as required under Section 89 of Adhiniyam, 1993 before issuing the demand notice - The respondent-State oppose
India Law Library Docid # 2414675

(50) IN REFERENCE Vs. VIJAY CHOUDHARY[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 15(2) – The petitioner argued that the respondent's conduct during the trial was derogatory and interfered with judicial proceedings, warranting criminal contempt proceedings - The respondent argued that the basis for the contempt proceedings was quashed by a co-ordinate bench and his actions were unintentional due to ill health and lack of intention to scandalize the court - The High Court found the respondent guilty of criminal contempt, imposing a fine a
India Law Library Docid # 2414676

(51) LALLO @ SUNEEL DAHIYA, S/O RAKESH KUMAR Vs. MOHD. AKRAM[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Motor Vehicular Accident– Compensation - Enhancement of compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident involving the offending vehicle driven by respondent no.1 and owned by respondent no.2. - The main issue was whether the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by its driver, which the Tribunal affirmed - The appellant argued for a higher compensation, citing the Tribunal's failure to consider the disability certificate and medical expenses incurred
India Law Library Docid # 2414677

(52) RAVIKANT S/O SHRI DEVKANT THAKKAR Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-05-2024
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) - Demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 2000 from the complainant - The case revolved around whether the prosecution proved the demand for a bribe and whether the appellant accepted it as a bribe or repayment of a loan from his wife to the complainant - The appellant's counsel argued that the demand was not proven, and the money was a repayment of a loan - The respondent's counsel argued that the appellant was caught red-handed and th
India Law Library Docid # 2414678

(53) UPTO MARK ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-05-2024
Contract - blacklisting of - The petitioners challenged the blacklisting order and contract termination by Indore Municipal Corporation - The main issues were the legality of blacklisting without a contract clause for it, lack of personal hearing, and absence of reasons for blacklisting - They argued that blacklisting was illegal as no hearing was provided, and it had serious consequences, akin to a "civil death" for the company - The respondent contended that due opportunity was given, and the
India Law Library Docid # 2414679

(54) LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD. Vs. KOSHIKA TELECOM LTD.[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 460 - Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 9 – The case involves the auction of movable and immovable assets of a company in liquidation, with disputes over the bifurcation of amounts received from the sale and the refund of a deposit made by a third-party objector - The Industrial Financial Corporation of India (IFCI) is facing a court case regarding its accountability for providing a detailed account of the amounts deposited with the Official Liquidator, in
India Law Library Docid # 2414693

(55) RAJESH DHAMIJA AND OTHERS Vs. INDER KUMAR DHAMIJA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Section 151 read with Order 18 Rule 17 – The case involves a dispute over a property and claimed to be purchased through a benami transaction by the petitioner's father and stepmother - The main issue is whether the property was indeed bought as a benami transaction and the legal implications thereof - The petitioners argue that they were not residing in India and relied on their counsel's advice, claiming that the trial court erred in dismissing their applicat
India Law Library Docid # 2414694

(56) THE CHIEF OFFICER PEN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND OTHER Vs. SHEKHAR B. ABHANG AT PARIT ALI AND OTHER[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 06-05-2024
Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - The Pen Municipal Council challenged an Industrial Court order directing the regularization of Respondent No.1 as a Tax Inspector and granting consequential benefits - The Council argued that Respondent No.1 was not eligible for direct appointment as Tax Inspector and his temporary appointment did not confer any right for regularization - Respondent No.1 argued that he was not a backdoor entrant, his appointmen
India Law Library Docid # 2414705

(57) NIKHILESH Vs. STATE OF HP[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-05-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 302, 201, 202 and 120-B – Murder - Pre-arrest bail - The main issue is whether the petitioners are involved in the alleged offences, particularly the destruction of evidence by cremating the deceased - The petitioners claim they have been falsely implicated, have no criminal history, and were not present at the alleged incident's location. They assure cooperation with the investigation without tampering with evidence or witnesses - The State opposes bail, assert
India Law Library Docid # 2414592

(58) INDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF H.P AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-05-2024
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation - The appellants filed suits seeking compensation for land used by the State for road construction. The main issue was whether the suits were barred by limitation, as they approached the court long after the cause of action accrued. The State argued that the road was constructed in 1981-1982 with implied consent and without compensation claims, alleging the suits were time-barred. The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the trial and lower appell
India Law Library Docid # 2414593

(59) VIDYA DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. SHAKUNTLA DEVI AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-05-2024
Property Dispute - Ancestral Property - The legal heirs of ‘G’ appellants herein are contesting the Will and property transfers made by ‘K’ claiming the properties to be ancestral and thus non-transferable by Will or sale - The main issue is whether the properties in question are ancestral and coparcenary, which would affect the validity of the Will, gift deeds, and sale deeds executed by ‘K’ - The appellants argue that the properties were ancestral, inherited from ‘R’ and ‘K’ had no right to tr
India Law Library Docid # 2414594

(60) SAURAV BHANDARI Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-05-2024
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21 and 29 - Recovery of 7.47 grams of heroin – The petitioner has been in custody since 04.12.2023 - His co-accused has already been granted bail - The petitioner argues for bail, highlighting the completion of the investigation, no further recoveries to be made, and the fact that he has already spent five months in custody - The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, has not expressed any apprehension regarding the
India Law Library Docid # 2414595